Btrustproject.eu

Inside the B-Trust co-creation playbook - Btrustproject.eu

Inside the B-Trust co-creation playbook 

enero 21, 2026 admin Comments Off

A practical methodology to bring farmers, citizens and biotech innovators to the same table

How do you feel when technologies that clearly spark controversy develop over your head and hit the shelves before we know it? 

This is the starting point for B-Trust. The project is working on a governance model for biotechnology in the agri-food and bio-based sectors that does not treat trust as a communication problem at the very end, but as something that is designed into the whole innovation journey from the beginning. At the heart of this approach sits a fine-tuned co-creation methodology. 

The B-Trust co-creation playbook moves beyond one-off workshops and traditional public consultations. It provides a structured pathway for regulators and implementers to work with affected communities, not merely speak about them. 

Phase one: Mapping risks, benefits and the people who matter 

The first phase focuses on understanding the landscape. For each biotech case, partners map two core elements. On the one hand, the risks and benefits identified in the literature, including scientific aspects related to health, safety and the environment, as well as socio-economic considerations. On the other hand, they identify the stakeholders who are directly or indirectly involved in, or affected by, the implementation of the technology. 

This goes beyond those active in developing, regulating or deploying the technology, and includes people and groups whose everyday lives may be shaped by its outcomes. 

This perspective requires looking past purely technical considerations. Farmers, consumers, environmental organisations, companies, researchers and public authorities may look at the same innovation and see very different aspects, or more concretely ‘risks and benefits’. Some focus on climate resilience or food security, others on long-term environmental impacts, affordability or control over the food system. 

B-Trust, thus starts from a mapping of the risks and benefits from a scientific point of view, to plot how each stakeholder group could potentially be affected by these risks and benefits. This visual map is then used to prioritise which actors need to be involved first, what questions they bring to the table and what kind of methods will work best for each of them. 

Phase two: Involving those who will be impacted the most: 

Once the landscape is clear, the second phase focuses on engagement. Rather than inviting everyone to one big event, B-Trust designs waves of interaction. These include consumer co-creation sessions, workshops with farmers, dialogues with environmental groups and conversations with other critical voices. 

Each wave has a clear purpose. Some are about exploring everyday perceptions and language around biotechnology. Others are about understanding hands-on concerns such as how a new crop might affect farm routines, markets or local ecosystems. Throughout, facilitators pay close attention to how people talk about risks, benefits, responsibilities and how they understand the used wordings around biotechnology. 

“Trust in biotechnology does not appear by magic at the end of a project. It is built step by step, through the way we listen, involve and share decisions with the people who are most affected.”

Phase three: Identifying and validating the trust barriers 

The goal is to identify trust barriers early. These can range from lack of information or confusion about who benefits, to deeper issues such as perceived unfairness, low transparency or past negative experiences with new technologies. Identification is followed by quantification; to find out which aspects are the biggest concern. 

Phase four: Co-designing trust-building measures and principles 

Insights from these waves of interaction are not just stored in reports. They are brought back to stakeholders in the fourth phase, where B-Trust co-designs concrete interventions to overcome these trust barriers and come to shared principles for building trust. 

This can include ideas on how to communicate about a technology in a more neutral and transparent way, what kind of involvement different actors expect in decision-making, or how responsibilities should be shared across companies, public authorities and other organisations. 

The result is a set of actor-specific trust-building measures and cross-cutting principles that will feed into a broader co-creation programme and, ultimately, into the B-Trust governance model. 

From method to impact 

The fine-tuned co-creation methodology is closely linked to the project’s Theory of Change and its Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning framework. This means that B-Trust is not only applying the methodology in several Biotech Co-Creation Cases, but also tracking what works, under which conditions and for whom. 

The ambition is clear. If Europe wants biotechnology that serves people and the planet, then it needs governance models that are grounded in real conversations with those who are most affected. B-Trust is turning that ambition into a practical playbook that others can adapt, reuse and scale. 

By Sofía Ros (Cluster FOOD+i), B-Trust communication lead 

The article was prepared in close collaboration with the authors of B-Trust deliverables D1.1, D1.2, D1.3 and D2.1, including Veerle Rijckaert and Charlotte Boone (Alice down the rabbit hole), and Mattia Forni and Harshita Thakare (LAMA). 

This article builds on publicly available B-Trust deliverables, in particular D1.1 Theory of Change, D1.2 MEL Report (M12), D1.3 Finetuned co-creation methodology and D2.1 Outline of co-creation trajectories. 

Privacy Summary

We use our own and third-party cookies for analytical purposes and to show you on our website personalized information based on a profile drawn up from your browsing habits. You can accept all cookies by pressing the "Accept cookies" button or reject their use.